Working Together to Reduce Repeat Offenses

Using Community Partnerships to Help Reduce Recidivism

Numerous community collaborations raise awareness of recidivism and its effects on people, families, and our society. However, as recidivism is a multifaceted problem including several social and economic issues, it is usually not possible for community leaders and organizations to directly address recidivism rates.

The best anti-recidivism collaborations concentrate on a range of problems to lower crime and increase stability following release from jail.

Crime and Its Effects

Many social workers, especially those in re-entry and community programs, concentrate primarily on recidivism, or the propensity of a formerly incarcerated person to commit crimes again. While each situation is unique, many people who have difficulty reintegrating into society go back to committing crimes. Put simply, insufficient prison programs lead to inadequate assistance, housing, and money for convicts as they prepare for life after prison.

The goal of several government and community collaboration initiatives has been to lower recidivism. Rearrests, prejudice, and other difficulties, however, continue to be major problems.

Recidivism Rates and Their Consequences for Society

In the United States, the current national recidivism rate is 37.1%. This indicates that almost one-third of those with prior convictions have a higher likelihood of committing crimes again and ending up behind bars. States have different rates; Delaware, Alaska, and Rhode Island have rates that are 50% or greater.

Still, examining reincarceration rates generally is insufficient. Studies conducted over an extended period of time showed that 82% of those released from state prisons are arrested at least once in a ten-year period. It is imperative that the community take action in response to this disproportionate arrest rate, which is not a coincidence.

Recidivis-mProducing Factors

The most frequent accusations against those facing recidivism and rearrest are still those related to public order violations. Lingering, disruptive conduct, disturbing the peace, and defying police orders are a few examples of these infractions. Drug, property, and violent offenses are among the other frequent accusations.

These fees are influenced by a number of variables, such as housing, income, and assistance.

Absence of Secure Housing

In the United States, an individual without housing has almost 500 times higher odds of facing criminal charges. A person with a criminal past may be sent back to prison for even a little loitering offense.

Some homeless people have purposefully committed new crimes in order to get food, housing, and help from the criminal justice system.

After being released from prison, the majority of ex-offenders live in households with family members and depend on them for financial assistance.

Sadly, not everyone is in this situation; some prisoners, particularly those who have served lengthier terms, lack family or friends who are ready to take them in. In response, a lot of community-building collaborations offer services such as secure housing that formerly incarcerated people would not have.

Underemployment or Unemployment

A steady job and income are essential for ex-offenders to transition to life outside of jail. In addition to helping with the cost of housing, food, and other necessities, a steady income is essential for independence and mental well-being.

A lot of community partners concentrate mostly on training, education, and job adjustment. For instance, collaborations with educational institutions provide inmates with instruction and tutoring to equip them for successful employment.

People with criminal histories have significant challenges when trying to reenter the employment, even with schooling and other supports. In the employment market, ex-offenders frequently face discrimination and stigma. This greatly reduces their employment options, if any, and typically leads in far lower pay than people who are not jailed.

Substance Abuse and Problems with Mental Health

Recidivism rates are greater for those with a history of drug misuse and severe mental illness than for other ex-offenders. Alcohol and other drugs have a detrimental effect on judgment and conduct, which can lead to the formation of new habits or the resumption of old ones. Even having alcohol or drugs might result in a person being arrested again and going back to jail, depending on any parole requirements that may be in place.

Recidivism rates among less severe mental health difficulties are often not greater than those of other prisoners. However, in order to ensure that everyone receives the assistance they require, mental health issues must still be taken into account for housing and rehabilitation. Furthermore, if an offender additionally struggles with drug misuse, their recidivism rate is much greater than that of other groups with minimal mental health difficulties.

A lot of re-entry programs document mental health issues that offenders have at the start of their sentences. Social workers and community partners, however, also need to be aware of the prevalent mental health problems that arise in prisons. Women are four times more likely than males to experience sexual assault and harassment while serving their sentences, which affects around 40% of convicts. Numerous people also endure mistreatment by prison personnel, which can exacerbate anxiety, sleeplessness, and the risk of suicide.

Not Enough Support Systems

Many people find it difficult to locate the community connections, resources, and support they require after being released, particularly if they are unable to rely on their family, even if each person’s network is unique. People with a criminal past may be more likely to commit crimes again if they lack finances, maybe by committing crimes for financial gain.

Former prisoners require emotional, financial, and physical care just like everyone else. To ensure that ex-offenders may get the support they need, the community offers resources for housing, food, jobs, and mental health.

The Fundamentals of Community Collaborations

Partnerships within the community benefit offenders, their communities, and the organizations that serve them. These alliances bring together individuals and groups who have common objectives that they often couldn’t accomplish on their own. They pool funds and resources to achieve better results and ongoing development.

Partnerships aimed at reducing recidivism seldom focus just on recidivism. Instead, they focus on the issues of housing, education, job, and community health that are causing today’s recidivism rates. But particular projects differ across collaborations.

Participants in the Reduction of Recidivism

The majority of partnerships begin with a small group of stakeholders, usually those who are most affected by the problem. Stakeholders may include beneficiaries, leaders of organizations and communities, representatives of the government, affected families, and others, depending on the project. When adopting a solution, stakeholders should be consulted as they often have a big say.

Partners and stakeholders in anti-recidivism initiatives might be:

• Officials and wardens in prisons
• Previous prisoners and their relatives
• leaders in colleges and universities
• Local authorities
• Entrepreneurs
• Local government representatives

The Advantages of Group Projects

Collaboratively, community partners gather resources, solutions, and connections. Because of this, community collaborations are able to do far more than they could with just one group.

Improve The Sharing of Resources

In many respects, partnerships increase the resources that are accessible to people and organizations. Government collaborations frequently give cash, while partnerships with schools provide educational materials to prisoners. These materials are essential for giving prisoners what they require to be self-sufficient, especially when utilizing underfunded programs.

Depending on your project, you ought to get in touch with many possible partners. Rather, think about the possible assets that various groups and teams may provide to your project. For example, if you want catering for a volunteer event, contacting many caterers might increase your options and lighten the workload for your partners. During the fundraising process, financial partners can even match each other’s donations.

Expand Employment and Education Opportunities

A lot of community collaborations concentrate on training and job readiness. Giving ex-offenders the freedom to create a steady income on their own is one of the most important ways to lower recidivism rates. They won’t be as likely to commit crimes again or give up on their life after release from jail.

Through partnerships with schools and universities, current offenders are able to earn college credits, a degree, or a GED while serving their sentences. Social workers and certain partnerships help people find possible employment prospects in addition to training and education. These might be anything from career fairs to positions that fit the candidate’s credentials specifically.

Boost Community Relations

Among the biggest challenges facing ex-offenders are stigmas and prejudices. Creating connections with the larger community can help raise awareness of the importance of recidivism prevention and the effectiveness of rehabilitation.

In addition, relationships can prevent ex-offenders from feeling alone once they’re back in the community. The knowledge that they have a support structure in place may inspire them to pursue their professional development even if they never take advantage of the resources provided. Partnerships can also assist members of the community in forming personal bonds and friendships.

Conclusion | Community Partnerships’ Contribution to Recidivism Reduction

Community partnerships offer extensive support networks that cater to the many needs of persons who are reentering society, which is vital in mitigating recidivism. These collaborations provide a comprehensive approach to rehabilitation by bringing together social services, educational institutions, local businesses, and law enforcement organizations. Community efforts foster an atmosphere that is favorable to effective reintegration by guaranteeing access to mental health care, secure housing, educational possibilities, and work prospects. By decreasing the chance of reoffending, this concerted effort improves public safety in addition to assisting ex-offenders in starting over.

The significance of a coordinated strategy for criminal justice reform is shown by the success of community partnerships in reducing recidivism rates. Through these collaborations, the capabilities and resources of different community stakeholders may be utilized to tackle the underlying reasons of criminal behavior and offer continuous assistance that goes beyond the first point of reintegration. This cooperative approach breaks the cycle of recidivism by benefiting not just the individuals directly involved but also the community at large, demonstrating the transformational potential of group action.

image courtesy

Photo by fauxels, Photo by PhotoMIX Company, Photo by energepic.com, Photo by Andrew Neel, Photo by Matthias Zomer.